Housing charity could be at risk if forced to buy expensive wooden windows

Sir Malcolm Stewart Bart General Charitable Trust Homes Stewartby

“Don’t make us pay more than three times as much for wooden windows.” That’s the plea from elderly residents of a charity’s housing estate in Stewartby.

Planning officers at Bedford Borough Council are insisting that the 54 homes at the Sir Malcolm Stewart Homes, should not be allowed to have uPVC double glazed windows because they would harm the conservation area.

“I can justify spending £7,000 on new uPVC windows, but I can’t justify spending £25,000 on new wooden windows,” leaseholder Andrew Marchant told Bedford Borough Council Planning Committee on Monday (22 Jul).

“I will never be able to afford it. Please approve the uPVC windows for the trust to maintain the vision of Sir Malcolm and lady Stewart.”

The homes were designed specifically to house retired workers of the London Brick Company and lie in the Stewartby Conservation area, where development is controlled to maintain the way it looks.

Debbie Hassall, a trustee of the Sir Malcolm Stewart Bart General Charitable Trust, said the future of the charity would be put at risk if it was forced to spend on more than 400 wooden windows for the 38 bungalows it owns. Another 16 are occupied by leaseholders.

“The windows are deteriorating, draughty, cold and difficult to heat in the winter,” she said. “It costs £600 per quarter for storage heaters. They are costly to repair, and this undermines the trust.”

She claimed that the uPVC windows are ‘almost identical in appearance’ to the wooden windows but the cost of new wooden windows would threaten the trust’s survival.

Planner Ian Johnson maintained his advice that the plan should be refused. He said that “cost is not a material consideration” for the council. He challenged the prices quoted, saying that the difference is not as great, and that the trust and he had “met suppliers who give longer guarantees.”

He said the main issue was the visual impact of the uPVC windows, which would harm the conservation area. He added that uPVC windows were more environmentally damaging, because of the amount of greenhouse gas emissions generated in their manufacture.

Cllr Wendy Rider (Lib Dem, Brickhill) said: “The windows are in a bad way but how can you tell the difference between the wooden ones and uPVC? I do not understand the problem.”

Cllr Alison Foster (Cons, Harrold) proposed a site visit, a move supported by council officers, who believe that the difference would become clear.

Three councillors voted to defer a decision pending a visit to the site, with none voting against.

Words: David Tooley, Local Democracy Reporter and Paul Hutchinson

Now more than ever, we need your help to fund the Bedford Independent’s quality journalism that serves our community...

We choose to champion editorial independence, meaning we report the facts without bias and can stand up to those in power when we believe it’s needed.

We can give a voice to people in our community whose voices may otherwise not be heard. And we don’t have a paywall, so everyone can read the stories we publish for free.

But in this time of crisis, many news organisations all over the world are facing existential threat, with advertising revenues plummeting. We’re no different.

We work hard every day to bring you news, commentary, entertainment and announcements from across Bedford. We hope that, with your help, we’ll be able to continue this for many years to come.

Will you help sustain our work today by clicking below ? Even a small donation makes a difference for our future.

Thank you for your support.